Dissent from Darwin
If you’re interested in knowing who’s who among scientist who doubt Darwin’s theory of evolution then go to this site. In it you will find a list of academics, scholars, scientists and medical
professionals from Harvard, MIT, Berkeley and other top research institutions stating their disagreement with Darwin’s theory to account for the complexity of life.
Also, click here to download an article written by Dr. Jonathan Wells, Ph.D, UC Berkeley. The article, titled “Survival of the Fakest,” reveals the hoaxes behind the famous “icons of evolution” that have been presented in Biology textbooks to prove evolution.
William Kang, InterHigh Fellowship











Hi,
I doubt you will find many signed scientist agreeing with 6 day creationist. I have
not read Wells paper, but I think the signers run the gamit of thiestic evolutionist/creationist to anti-creationist. Personally, Darwin’s descent of speciation through natural selection and mutation is inadequate to explain the
protein folding, which is illustrated by toxin co-evolution btwn different family of
vertebrate. This illustrate the point that Darwinism cannot account for the RNA/DNA material that natural selection needs to select. So allowing Darwinian
theory of evolution to dominate over the
other laws of science is not justified. God Bless
.
Leave your response!